Monday, February 16, 2009

Death by Fire - Tigers' End-Game (updated)

Author: Rover

- update of my last post -

After 30 years of self-destruction of its cadre with the intention of terrorizing innocent civilians by creating suicide bombers, LTTE is now encouraging self destruction of their remaining cadre in protest (to gain sympathy) of being annihilated for being suicide bombers and terrorists! Seriously, how smart is this? Here I analyze generally why people resort to death by fire, the explicit message the LTTE is trying to convey by this, and the futility of this primitive practice.

People practice self-immolation for two major reasons: renouncement and devotion.

Self-immolation for renouncement: In the modern context, the most common form of self-immolation for renouncement is as a political protest. Usually, someone from the weaker political entity would burn oneself in protest of the practices of a stronger and deviant political force. This was the case when Thich Quan Duc, a Mahayana Vietnamese Buddhist monk burned himself in protest of the mal-treatment that was inflicted upon the clergy by the Ngo Dinh Deim’s government. In another case, a University of California (at San Diego) student burned himself in protest of the active presence of US troops in Vietnam. There are numerous cases of self immolation to express renouncement.

Self-immolation for Devotion: The most famous example of self immolation for devotion is the archaic Hindu practice of Sati, where a new widow jumps into the burning pier of her dead husband. This practice has now been banned in India; and was never condoned by Mahabarata (a prominent Hindu religious text). In another case of devotion, with the schism of the Russian church, entire villages of the orthodoxy (Russian Orthodox Church) burned themselves and termed it “Baptism Fire”. This is just one example out of many, especially by fundamentalist religious sects, for who practiced mass self immolation to express devotion. Self-immolation is also prevalent in India for hard to believe more mundane reasons to do with public figures. For example, a man burned himself when Tamil movie superstar Rajinikanth’s marriage was not doing well in the 1980s. In another instance when Muthuvel Karunanidhi the present chief minister of the Indian state of Tamil Nadu was arrested by his rival M.G. Ramachandran in 1981, eleven Tamil people burned themselves to express devotion to Karunanidhi. Though these men burned themselves predominantly in devotion to the leader, they were also renouncing his arrest - so both devotion and renouncement can sometimes be interwoven, and hard to be distinguish from each other. LTTE now seems to be targetting this self-burning tendency of especially the uneducated oppressed masses of South India to further its propaganda.

Curiously, some Hindus and some sects of Christians practice localized immolation to show devotion to their respective gods. A sect of French Jesuits burn pars of their bodies (thigh, foot, palms ect.) in devotion for the pain that Jesus felt when he was crucified.

Importantly, however there are two more reasons for death by fire, which are usually not much talked about. These are forced burnings and self-immolation for cursing.

Forced burnings (by others) - It is known that during the time of the historical Rus' people (mostly ancient Russians, Belorussians and Ukrainians), when a slave owner died a loyal female slave was burnt with the master. In India, forced burnings of wives who didn’t want to perform Sati when their husbands died, are reported. In the old west, infidels and witches were burned at a stake. Usually a witch hunt ended in burning of a few innocents that behaved differently from others. Though “forced burnings” is not strictly a practice of self-immolation, I include it here, as you see later, because someone can be MENTALLY forced to do this.

Self-immolation to curse someone – This is little known, but at least two groups of people in India, the Charans and Rajputs self immolate to bring a curse upon someone who had perpetrated a foul deed upon them (or their people). Both these groups are North Indian Aryan (not South Indian Dravidian) sects that are renowned for their martial abilities. Interestingly, they perform self-immolation only against a closely related entity; faced with a distantly related foe, they always wage violent war. This character is important in what I am going to talk in relation to the LTTE.

Several hardcore LTTE supporters, and perhaps these were even former suicide cadre of the LTTE, recently self-immolated: one person in Switzerland and two in Tamil Nadu died, and one man in London was injured. Anyway, these acts were in support of the LTTE who is now facing an imminent military annihilation at the hands of the Sri Lanka defense forces.

The LTTE self-immolations, I argue, are a combination for all the four reasons (renouncement, devotion, forced burning and self immolation for cursing). Through these, it disparages the government’s military campaign against the LTTE, where the Tigers have lost significant amounts of land (which they fanatically revere and call Eelam) and cadre. These immolations are clearly a message to the west and the Tamil community in general to join in greater protest. But protest for what?! It must be the first time in contemporary history that supporters are setting themselves alight in the hope of saving an INTERPOL absconding terrorist chief and an internationally proscribed terrorist organization.

Through self-burning, LTTE cadre also show devotion to the cause (attaining Tamil Eelam) and the "demi-god" Prabhakaran. It is well known that LTTE have a culture very much different from the other Dravidian Hindus. The true Tigers venerate their leader and land more than anything else, even more so than Hinduism (Hinduism embodies Indian cultural aspects as well and is not only a religion), which they consider to be a pariah concept; lack of respect for Hinduism is shown by the killing of several Hindu priests, desecrating Hindu temples (for example the mayor of Jaffna, Alfred Duraiappah was killed by the Tiger leader at point blank inside a Hindu temple), and constant Eelamization of names associated with the LTTE (for example, Eelam is now called Ezham, and Prabhakarana is called Paripaharan ect.). Interestingly, though normally Hindus prefer to cremate (burn) the bodies of their dead and float the resulting ashes in a sacred river, LTTE prefer to bury their dead so that they can build cemeteries that can later be glorified. This too is a deviant practice from Hinduism.

There is an enormous and constant social pressure from the LTTE leadership towards its members to support the LTTE; and this includes facilitating (or forcing) self-immolation. This too has been prevalent throughout its history. One of the main reasons for the west to ban this organization was the harassment of the Diaspora by the LTTE (illegal taxation ect.). One might protest the third claim, but one must remember that LTTE is not a group of freedom fighters but a world renowned group of terrorists; who have pioneered and mastered the self-destruction of human beings, the suicide bombings. So self-immolation of the LTTE is not recent if you consider self-destruction through suicide bombing (where there is also burning involved) as a form of self-immolation where you also kill other people; forced self immolation after all, is only small deviation from the psychology that is involved in suicide bombings; and Tigers are well known to brainwash people to become suicide bombers.

From some of the letters that were found at some of the immolation sites and immolated persons, it is evident that the LTTE hate Buddhism and Sinhalese deeply, and that the people who immolated themselves prominently cursed these two aspects. But unlike the Charnas and Rajputs of India, who are North Indian Aryans, it seems it is the first time that Dravidians that indulged in this practice of cursing through immolation to a significant level. So LTTE is yet again innovative in an unenviable way, in giving the Dravidians a foul name.

Now a rumor is spreading around that the LTTE leaders and its cadre entrapped in Wanni are going to commit suicide (by fire or otherwise). Fire has fascinated the first ape-men since they first started walking upright. So the death of these primitive LTTE terrorists too could very well be by fire. But I urge others LTTE supporters, especially the LTTE supporting diaspora not to get distracted by the LTTE efforts to play to the lower instincts of man. Think through your head, before setting yourself alight for a guy who thought only about himself. In addition this rumor is spread, I think, to encourage mentally forced self-immolation, especially targeting the oppressed masses of Tamil Nadu.

It is however very interesting to note that out of the three people who died so far, two are Indians from Tamil Nadu (the nationality of the person who died in Siwtzerland remain unknown). Sri Lankans are usually considered to be more educated than the Tamil Nadu Indians (literacy rate is higher in Sri Lankans than Tamil Nadu), and so it maybe harder to convince Sri Lankan Tamils to burn themselves for a lost cause. This is indeed an encouraging sign.

There are other reasons why self-immolation is a defeatist paradigm. Even from an evolutionary viewpoint, burning oneself is counter productive as one can't pass on ones genes to the next generation, or successfully raise ones children if they already have any. It is also known that, unlike in India, the Western society considers self-immolation as a problem to the society, and hence a crime. This is exemplified by the British Police charging the man who got half-burned in London, with arson. So getting fully or half-burned for Eelaam or Prabhakaran through self-immolation is, for many reasons, the silliest thing that one could do.

Finally anyway, thousands of Sri Lankan and Indian civilians and soldiers, including two heads of states (one from India and the other from Sri Lanka), who died by the fire of the LTTE suicide bombers will undoubtedly not object to the last few of these suicide cadres (or those who are closely associated with them) attaining death by fire, if they must (!), without dragging other innocents around them to go to the fiery hell hole with them.

13 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Acknowledgments: I thank "T" and "ReallyCold" (two other bloggers) for the encouragement and helping me with suggestions to improve this note (see comments on my previous post).

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hello Rover - Your story about self imolation is excellent, I very much enjoyed reading it. Please write more articles. I too went to the protest in London and saw the trouble the LTTE supporters did.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have followed your writings in DW for a long time. When every one was attacking each other you tried to get them together. Only a very few Sri Lankans I know would do this. I really like to know you better.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. HI Rover:

    It is nice to see that you have started a blog. I would like to post a comment I posted in Boston Globe. This comment is about “Genocide” accusation of Brue Fein.

    People are blinded by many things. Some times it is patriotism that blinds them. May be it is religion. It could be power or search of glory. Then it could be some ideal they hold on. Also it could be money. I cannot say what has exactly blinded Mr. Bruce Fein. What ever blinds him it creates disastrous inhumane bias against innocent civilians and instigates a culture of worship of suicide bombing, using civilians as defense body armor, drug trafficking, human smuggling, kidnapping children and sending them to war front as canon fodder, credit card frauds and various other crimes. I as a humanist appreciate and admire any human being who speaks up against oppression but when people patronize terrorism in the name of humanity that is a worse crime than terrorism itself. If one wants to stand against oppression in true sense then they must oppose all forms of oppression. Only then we can stand as true humanist and help oppressed people. An example which satisfies this condition is University Teachers for Human Rights, Jaffna, Sri Lanka.

    Added to this comment:

    I do not wish to whitewash or talk down horribleness of 1983 riots. Leaders of then Government were responsible for that crime. This is obvious. As Ananda Sangari once pointed our, what is not obvious is that what happened was what LTTE exactly wanted to happen. Then Government played into the hands of LTTE. Though this does not alleviate the role of Sinhalese mob or that of the Government, 1983 riots speaks up volumes for cruelty, barbarianism, unscrupulousness of LTTE. If the LTTE can use so called their own people, whom they say that they are the sole representative of, as bait and if the LTTE can kill their own people whom they say they are liberating without any mercy and if the LTTE can use the people whom they are going to liberate as cheap defense armour that has less less value than a bag of dirt that itself stands as evidence of their inhumane nature of unspeakable magnitude. If so called humanists cannot see this, then if this is not natural blindness of perceiving reality, then it should be a blindness caused by wishful search of wealth. This kind of blindness is as bad as LTTE terrorism.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hello Mahinda, I am glad that you liked this. I aim to update this once a week, for the lack of free time.

    It is just the disposition of most people, they are not necessarily evil or anything.

    You certainly can write to me (I have my email address given here), but I won't like to give up my identity, as I may be writing controversial accounts that may not please everyone. But I will respond to you as rover. Hope you understand.

    Best wishes, R.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Dear Swarnajith Udana,

    Thank you. Really glad you found my blogspot.

    I quite agree with your point that you made. Perhaps it would be worthwhile to write a lengthy account on this aspect (how a 30 year war could be made on an incident that occurred under a week, to which only less than 1% of the population contributed).

    Really appreciate your effort in nullifying the inhumanistic eelamist argument.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Dear Rover:

    Thank you very much for your suggestion. To right a scholarly article you need to use citations. This facility and time that is needed are items of luxury for me at the moment. Still I would like to contribute in a more casual manner to your blog in a meaningful way as time permits. I am a great friend of science. Still I am critical of how they are taught and learned. Though I believe in form of objectivism I also believe that subjectivism is involved in all aspects of our lives, even in science (for lesser extent in Mathematics). That is one reason that I believe Buddha was wise enough to ask not to believe even him. History is a very important part of any subject. One cannot really understand mathematics or Science without some understanding of History of Mathematics and Science. When you lean into the realm of History one needs to be very careful. I am not talking about truth here. Truth or not, one needs to be sincere. The aspect of sincerity is the only aspect I have the most control of. I need to be essentially confident that I have taken all the care possible to utter the most sincere thing I can utter. To do that you need to go through many sources. It requires time. History is important if we understand and are guided by its limitations. Buddha once said “Do not worry about the history of the arrow that has wounded you, just take it out.” Once again given that we understand these limitations, then History needs to be studied to seek guidance and better grasp of problems and concepts.

    For the post now:

    If there is single reason why crime prevails, what is it? It is the fact that we own one of most dangerous weapon. In appearance it is soft, delicate and pinky. The vicious aspect of this does not come from its appearance. It comes from its flexibility. This flexibility is needed for its original purpose. Being very clever we have used this most resourceful aspect as a tool of dehumanization. It can bend up and down and left and right. It can even be rolled.

    The tongue.

    It is one of the most vicious weapons of dehumanization. Do you need proof? Consider this.

    "We are deeply sad and puzzled at the attitude of the apex institution of humanity, the United Nations, in not taking effective measures to protect the life, security and interests of innocent Tamil civilians," said LTTE's Political Head B. Nadesan on Tuesday. "

    If it is not the fault of tongue what is it?

    Nadasan complains that UN has not taken any effective measures to protect innocent Tamil civilian lives. How true is this? Is not this true if we assume that tongue has different meanings to the words according what slant it takes. Is it not true that UN has demanded LTTE release civilians. It surprises Nadasen that UN does not seem to stand for saving the life of LTTE. This particular Nadasen-tongue also says more than that.

    It is god given right that they can maim and kill people at will. It is god given right that LTTE can do drug trafficking, prostituting, human smuggling, credit card frauds. It can wear so called its own people as defensive body armour. It can use the people that they are saying they are liberating as pawns who would face agonised death so that it can be used for propagandistic and/or military value. They can submerge “their own people” if they can just reverse their military debacles. The LTTE is asking who can interfere with these God given rights. Who will dare to question these rights given by Son God? That is what he is claiming.

    Is this not the fault of tongue? To complete this note it is necessary that I mention another tongue-crime. That happened in Parliament in mid sixties. One Member of Parliament said in the parliament that he could not sleep until each Tamil is killed and he wears slippers made out of the skin of the last Tamil killed.

    How can we tame the tongue? To tame the tongue we need to tame the thoughts. How do we tame the thoughts? Thoughts have materialistic base most of the time. As we believe we are evolved from apes. Apes are territorial. This had be other wise they could not have survived. We inherited this tribalistic and territorial nature form our forefathers. This is also not bad in itself if we understand that was necessary for our survival. May be still this behaviour has some positive role to play in our lives. The problem is that we raise these natural instincts to level of super ideals that have no material basis and have their own existence.

    The ideal become even bigger than the Universe itself. Then we develop xenophobia. If we understand that all these natural instincts are common for all of us and if we also know that we all share the same tears and laughs, dreams and hopes, life and death perhaps may be we will be able to tame our thoughts and develop a form of patriotism based on universality of justice and equality. This may help us to tame our tongues.

    Nadasan’s tongue is further evidence of the viciousness of intrinsic nature of LTTE. LTTE and its supporters are basically unable to feel its viciousness. How can any one question God given right to be inhumane? Unbelievable is this for them, as it seems.

    (Forgive my typos if I haven’t caught them.)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Dear Rover:

    Thank you very much for your suggestion. To right a scholarly article you need to use citations. This facility and time that is needed are items of luxury for me at the moment. Still I would like to contribute in a more casual manner to your blog in a meaningful way as time permits. I am a great friend of science. Still I am critical of how they are taught and learned. Though I believe in form of objectivism I also believe that subjectivism is involved in all aspects of our lives, even in science (for lesser extent in Mathematics). That is one reason that I believe Buddha was wise enough to ask not to believe even him. History is a very important part of any subject. One cannot really understand mathematics or Science without some understanding of History of Mathematics and Science. When you lean into the realm of History one needs to be very careful. I am not talking about truth here. Truth or not, one needs to be sincere. The aspect of sincerity is the only aspect I have the most control of. I need to be essentially confident that I have taken all the care possible to utter the most sincere thing I can utter. To do that you need to go through many sources. It requires time. History is important if we understand and are guided by its limitations. Buddha once said “Do not worry about the history of the arrow that has wounded you, just take it out.” Once again given that we understand these limitations, then History needs to be studied to seek guidance and better grasp of problems and concepts.

    For the post now:

    If there is single reason why crime prevails, what is it? It is the fact that we own one of most dangerous weapon. In appearance it is soft, delicate and pinky. The vicious aspect of this does not come from its appearance. It comes from its flexibility. This flexibility is needed for its original purpose. Being very clever we have used this most resourceful aspect as a tool of dehumanization. It can bend up and down and left and right. It can even be rolled.

    The tongue.

    It is one of the most vicious weapons of dehumanization. Do you need proof? Consider this.

    "We are deeply sad and puzzled at the attitude of the apex institution of humanity, the United Nations, in not taking effective measures to protect the life, security and interests of innocent Tamil civilians," said LTTE's Political Head B. Nadesan on Tuesday. "

    If it is not the fault of tongue what is it?

    Nadasan complains that UN has not taken any effective measures to protect innocent Tamil civilian lives. How true is this? Is not this true if we assume that tongue has different meanings to the words according what slant it takes. Is it not true that UN has demanded LTTE release civilians. It surprises Nadasen that UN does not seem to stand for saving the life of LTTE. This particular Nadasen-tongue also says more than that.

    It is god given right that they can maim and kill people at will. It is god given right that LTTE can do drug trafficking, prostituting, human smuggling, credit card frauds. It can wear so called its own people as defensive body armour. It can use the people that they are saying they are liberating as pawns who would face agonised death so that it can be used for propagandistic and/or military value. They can submerge “their own people” if they can just reverse their military debacles. The LTTE is asking who can interfere with these God given rights. Who will dare to question these rights given by Son God? That is what he is claiming.

    Is this not the fault of tongue? To complete this note it is necessary that I mention another tongue-crime. That happened in Parliament in mid sixties. One Member of Parliament said in the parliament that he could not sleep until each Tamil is killed and he wears slippers made out of the skin of the last Tamil killed.

    How can we tame the tongue? To tame the tongue we need to tame our thoughts. How do we tame the thoughts? Thoughts have materialistic base most of the time. As we believe we are evolved from apes. Apes are territorial. This had to be other wise they could not have been able to survive. We inherited this tribalistic and territorial nature form our forefathers. This is also not bad in itself if we understand that was necessary for our survival. Maybe still this behaviour has some positive role to play in our lives. The problem arises when we raise these natural instincts to level of super ideals that have no material basis and have their own existence.

    The ideal become even bigger than the Universe itself. Then we develop xenophobia. If we understand that all these natural instincts are common for all of us and if we also know that we all share the same tears and laughs, dreams and hopes, life and death perhaps may be we will be able to tame our thoughts and develop a form of patriotism based on universality of justice and equality. This may help us to tame our tongues.

    Nadasan’s tongue is further evidence of the viciousness of intrinsic nature of LTTE. LTTE and its supporters are basically unable to feel its viciousness. How can any one question God given right to be inhumane? Unbelievable is this for them, as it seems.

    (Forgive my typos if I haven’t caught them.)
    February 17, 2009 9:27 PM

    ReplyDelete
  11. Dear Swarnajith Udana,

    Thank you very much for your thoughts, I very much value them. With your permission, I can put your piece as an article on the blog (this would give it wider publicity, and the message it contains, I think, is valuable).

    Yes, I too come from a science background, and objectivity as you too advocate is what we strive for. I yearn to achieve this in the writing I do and intend to do (on anthropology, history, current affairs ect.). I always wanted, even as a kid, to understand the liberal and fine arts and religion better, and I think this has made me a better person.

    In writing the self-immolation article was to show at least the few LTTE guys who want to listen, the futility of the attempt. I want all Sri Lankans to be a humane group of people.

    ReplyDelete
  12. SU, Another thing I forgot to mention is, in this type of note, I try to avoid giving citations ect. (though the article itself is based on published lit.) as the audience I intend this for is the public, journalists, and bureaucrats ect. I try to use a light, mundane sort of style; I am not sure if I was successful in this, but this was the attempt.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Dear Rover:

    Thank you very much. You may put my post as an article.

    Swarnajith Udana

    ReplyDelete